RESCUE MY HOME: Foreclosure Defense and Debt Solutions Blog
A community of free information sharing provided to the public by your friends at the Law Offices of Bilu & Bilu. "Your home is your castle and under the law you are entitled to defend it."
A community of free information sharing provided to the public by your friends at the Law Offices of Bilu & Bilu. "Your home is your castle and under the law you are entitled to defend it."
Oct 15th
Posted by admin in Uncategorized
Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water… This burgeoning crisis plays out like the sequel to horror movie. We have been warning our clients for years about the danger of deficiency judgments in Florida. I recently met with a client who was served with a Deficiency Judgment for over $250,000. Because he never responded to the initial Foreclosure Suit, the court issued a default against him. Once that default was entered, he had lost his right to defend the lawsuit against him and was not even aware that the Bank was seeking a deficiency judgment against him.
The best way to deal with a potential deficiency (and Deficiency Judgment) is resolve it with the bank as part of a settlement. That settlement is will normally take the form of a Short Sale, Deed-in-lieu of Foreclosure, or entering into a Consent Judgment with the bank. While there are no guarantees, the vast majority of these types of settlements (approaching 99% of the cases that we settle, by my estimate) will include a waiver of deficiency as part of the express settlement terms.
But what happens if you didn’t or couldn’t settle? In those cases where the bank won’t agree to waive the deficiency as part of a settlement, we will often recommend that our client’s file a bankruptcy while the foreclosure case is still going on (or before a foreclosure sale if a judgment has already been issued) or at least before they see a large improvement in their financial situation. The last thing we want to see is our clients get knocked down right after they get back on their feet, like some of the borrowers in this article. If Bankruptcy is not an option, then we help settle the debt with either a lump sum payment or an affordable payment plan. The point is don’t wait until it is too late.They\'re Back…. and just in time for Halloween
Sep 10th
Posted by admin in Uncategorized
First off– wow! What an amazing in depth report from the Center for Public Integrity. It is definitely worth the time to sit down and read this article. I will warn you, though, that unless you are a lender, this article may be very depressing. There is a silver lining to the black cloud that this article paints, however. Yes, there is no doubt that the Courts in South Florida are pushing foreclosure cases to “resolution” as fast as they can. But (and this is an important “but”) resolution can also work in favor of a homeowner- especially if your case has been languishing in the Court system. Why do is say that? In my experience, the older a case is, the better chances a homeowner has at trial! I get really excited when I have a trial scheduled for a case from 2010 or earlier. Foreclosure law in Florida has evolved and changed a lot in the last few years, making it much harder for lenders to prove their cases- especially when it comes to Standing at the Time of Inception– in layman’s terms, the operative question is “Did this Plaintiff (bank/lender) own the note and have the right to enforce it when they filed this lawsuit? Once this is raised as an Affirmative Defense in your lawsuit, this becomes a fact that the bank needs to prove at trial- and it isn’t easy to do that when the servicers and/or owners of loan have changed multiple times- often after the lawsuit has been initiated.
With that being said, the bank’s attorneys know much more than the average non-lawyer homeowner does about the system, and will take advantage of that with pro se (or unrepresented) defendants. There are usually 100-160 trials set in Broward County every day and the vast majority of them are either uncontested (the homeowner doesn’t hire an attorney and doesn’t show up for the trial) or settled (usually with the bank getting a judgment, agreeing to waive its deficiency claim and sometimes giving the homeowner some money to help with moving expenses). That usually leaves about 5-10 contested trials per day. Well, i have news for you, a lot of those contested trials end up as victories for the homeowners. I have had a good streak as of late with my cases that are 2010 and older– When i show up for trial, the bank dismisses the case rather than take it to trial. Why, because they know that there is an element of their case that they can’t prove. Further, they know that a good foreclosure defense attorney will know how to turn that into a win! I know that if my clients in those cases had decided not to hire me (or another competent attorney) the bank’s attorney would have probably convinced them to agree to a judgment.
I am always honest and up-front with my clients- if I don’t think that we have a good case for trial, I encourage them to settle the case. But when we have a good case, there is nothing better than the sweet smell of victory!
Center for Public Integrity takes on Florida Foreclsoures
Mar 19th
Posted by admin in Uncategorized
Banks make mistakes all the time. Apparently it doesn’t even matter if you have a mortgage these days! The underlying problem is that the banks and their Wall Street cronies have not gotten out of the mindset of treating people and their homes as commodities.
Oct 4th
Posted by admin in Uncategorized
What a load of self-serving tripe! It is the lenders who are the real vampires in this situation (no disrespect intended to the undead!) There are 2 reasons why the banks are so reluctant to take physical possession of these foreclosed properties. The one obvious reason that the banks are not taking over these properties is that they are artificially holding back supply to increase demand. With the amount of foreclosed homes in Florida, there is no natural market reason that there should be bidding wars on bank-owned properties. But there are, because of the the sheer amount of inventory that these lenders are holding back. Add to that the cost of winterizing homes (in those areas that have winters) and you have your second reason for these lenders to delay taking possession of these properties until they are ready to release them into the market.
The upshot of all this is that the banks’ strategy will ultimately backfire. Because of the way that they are manipulating the market, and their preference for accept offers from cash buyers (i.e, investors) they are setting up the market for another bubble that will lead to reductions in property values, again!
Aug 29th
Posted by admin in Uncategorized
I had another client come in yesterday with “information” from the Hartford Land Trust about his property. I had to explain to him what these Land Trust companies really are (scams- in case you haven’ figured that out by now!). I also had to explain that while I seemed angry, I was not angry at him. What really raises my ire is the fact that thousands of Homeowners fall victim to scams like this. Worse than that, I know how many of them we could have helped had they not fallen for these ludicrous schemes. That is not to say that these Homeowners are completely blameless. I don’t know about your mother, but mine always taught me, “If something seems too good to be true, it probably is!”
Aug 23rd
Posted by admin in Uncategorized
As someone who deals with servicers on a daily basis, none of this is surprising. I cannot count the amount of times that we have email confirmation from a servicer that they received the requested documents, only to be told later that our loan modification/short sale is denied because they did not receive the document in question. You would think that once we are able to show the servicer that the mistake was on their part, not ours, it would be a relatively simple fix– unfortunately that is not the case. Once we are able to confirm the receipt we then have to pierce through several layers of Khafka-esque bureaucracy to get a manager who can review the file and then re-open it. Sometimes they can’t even do that, and we have to start the file all over again and request that a different manages expedite the file.
None of this will change until there is a change in the way loan servicing is billed. The way mortgage servicing works is that the servicer keeps about .5% of what they collect on a performing loan. When a loan is in default, not only does the servicer get to keep its percentage, it also gets to keep any late fees, which are the first thing payments are applied to, regardless of whether they come from the Homeowner, a short sale, or a foreclosure sale. This can push the servicers profit on a loan up to 2000% in some cases (no that not a typo– two thousand percent). Because of the way the system is set up, servicers have a very real financial incentive to not process loss mitigation effectively and to accidentally (on purpose) misplace or misfile documents and otherwise find a way to submarine a loss mitigation attempt. It is a crying shame that investors and lenders are not filing Breach of Fiduciary Duty suits against these servicers, as they are sometimes getting screwed harder than the Homeowners.
Aug 14th
Posted by admin in Uncategorized
Okay so I am using this forum to vent today. First off, for those of those in the industry this is not news. We all knew the real reason that the banks were presenting us with false documents in Trust/CDO cases. We knew why their attorneys were fighting us when we requested copies of the PSAs (Pooling and Servicing Agreements) governing the Plaintiff Trusts. For those of you who don’t follow this as closely as we do, here is a short explanation. Basically, when mortgages are pooled into trusts to form mortgage backed securities, the trust is governed by a PSA which, among other things, specifies both the method and the date by which a mortgage may be transferred into the Trust. The problem is that these procedures and timelines were largely ignored. When we in the Foreclosure Defense Community figured this out, we showed the Court that the PSAs were not being complied with and then argued that because the mortgage never became a part of the Trust, the Trust didn’t own the Mortgage and therefore did not have standing to bring a lawsuit. In any other arena this would be a winning strategy! The Florida Judiciary (at least in 15, 17th and 11th circuits) has consistently refused to allow our experts (certified securitization auditors) to testify and will not consider any any evidence regarding the Trust’s acquisition of the Mortgage. The reasoning that we are given is that since the Homeowner is not a party to the Trust, they do not have the right to enforce the terms of the trust. While this rationale may work when a party has no recognized legal interest in the subject matter of a contract, it makes absolutely no sense in this context. For example, if a deed to a property is not prepared correctly, it is invalid and the new owner does not own the property- period! What the Courts are ruling, basically, is that the Trust owns the Mortgage because they say they own the mortgage– that’s not justice, that’s justice for sale.
Still I am happy the information is out in the open and I hope that it opens some eyes.
If a Tree Falls In The Forest And No One Is There, Does it Make A Sound… Apparently Not!!!
Aug 9th
Posted by admin in Uncategorized
Mortgage Defaults are down, but foreclosure rates are steady. What does that mean? That means that that the banks still have a huge backlog that they are dealing with. Basically they are finding, or possibly fabricatiing, the documentation they need to initiate foreclosure proceedings for the properties that they haven’t started the process on yet. Additionally, there is they are also dealing with the issue that I posted about last week, Homeowners that are defaulting on their mortgages after they are modified.
We Will Be Doing This For A While
Aug 2nd
Posted by admin in Uncategorized
Modification Re-Defaults. We have had quite a bit experience with this recent phenomenon. There are 2 basic reasons that we are seeing this. Reason number 1- . To quote James Carville, “Its the Economy, Stupid!” As the report indicates, many people default on their modified payments because they cannot continue to afford them- often the result of unemployment, underemployment, or some sort of emergency. Reason number 2 is what i like to call “strategic re-default.” Let me give you a real life example. We represent a borrower who has hired us to modify his loan, which is in default. While we are applying for the modification, the lender files a foreclosure suit, which we defend. Finally after 3+ years of trying to modify the loan while we fight the foreclosure in Court, the bank sends us a modification agreement. Good news, right? Nope. Its a terrible modification– I’ll spare you the detailed financial analysis and sum it up like this: If the borrower accepted the modification, he would be paying 31% of his monthly income to the bank for the next 23 years. At the end of 23 years he would have a balloon payment equal to the entire principal balance on the date of default. So why did I recommend that my client accept the modification? Easy– once we accept the modification and he starts making payments again, the bank dismisses the suit. After the suit is dismissed, he will default again. It will take the bank, on average, about 9 months to file a new suit, which we can then go on to defend for several years. Financially, this is a much smarter scenario, especially considering the fact that since the bank has agreed to lower interest rate, any final judgment amount will be much lower. Final thing to consider is this: If the bank had agreed to extend his loan term out to 40 years from the date of the modification, the loan would be paid in full (his new payments were amortized over 40 years).
Jun 21st
Posted by admin in Uncategorized
I just got off the phone with a potential client who walked away from her house a year ago after she was served with Foreclosure Papers. She moved out of state, and after reading an article like this one, got worried and started calling attorneys in South Florida. I was floored when she told me that 2 other attorneys she had spoken to told her not to worry about it- that banks almost never pursue deficiency judgments. That is horrible legal advice, and in my opinion borders on malpractice. The fact is that up until last week the banks had 5 years after foreclosing on a home to pursue a deficiency judgment. Now that Gov. Scott has signed the new Foreclosure Bill into law, the banks only have one year to do so. That is bad news for homeowners, as now banks who may have been biding there time to see if the government would offer incentives to them in the future not to pursue Deficiency Judgments, will now be pursuing them as a matter of course. Even if your lender decides not to pursue the deficiency judgment, it does not mean that the deficiency goes away. They can still sell your debt to a debt collector who will harass you to get paid. Even if they don’t, the balance will continue to be posted to your credit report adn drag down your score for up to 7 years. You have a lot of options prior to a sale in which you can deal with your deficiency ,like a Short Sale, Consent Judgment, Deed-in-Lieu of Foreclosure. After the sale you only have one option– Bankruptcy (which we can help you with too) !
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Oct | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
Recent Comments